chani: (Default)
[personal profile] chani

I'm watching an English documentary full of british humour about the Da Vinci Code. The actor Tony Robinson is "on a mission" trying to find out clues about Brown's truth. It's quite entertaining because of Robinson's style. Brown refused to give him an interview btw.

I must say first that I didn't like The Da Vinci Code and I'm not going to see the movie starring Tom Hanks and Audrey Tautou.

I didn't like that book mostly because, as I told Frances, I thought it isn't a good mystery novel. It's easy to read but not well written, it's a blatant lie easy to figure out and the characters are flat. Being a sucker for mysteries and crime novels I can see the difference between that poorly plot and what is written by good American authors. Besides there's nothing refreshing in DVC.

Brown only used old stuff  from previous novels (about The Grail meaning actually Sang Réal and Le Prieuré de Sion) and developed many unlikely connections that would have made Umberto Eco laugh his ass out (sorry Professore!). Besides as a Historian, there are a few things that pissed me off (about The Templars and medieval stuff), and I knew that the so-called secret society, le Prieuré de Sion, was completely made up by 3 French men in the 80's. As Robinson said, it's like The Monty Python! It was nothing but a con and a joke between friends. The problem is that Brown presented it as something historically accurate. And many readers believed him. As a History Teacher I'm bothered by that of course.

What happened then reminds me a lot of what Eco decribed in Foucault's Pendulum. Some people became convinced that the Prieuré was true and the fake sources made by our jokers were real!

The con worked in the 80's and a first book ensued (Holy Blood Holy Grail).

The question could be is Dan Brown some fool who bought the con and drew his inspiration from Baigent's book...genuinely, or did he knowingly dig this fake stuff out to make his own best-seller 20 years later? I don't think it matters actually. He stroke it lucky, good for him!

But as Robinson says at the end of the documentary, Dan Brown only did what many poor medieval authors used to do...Mankind changes and at the same time remains the same still.

Date: 2005-06-16 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] so-sharlemaine.livejournal.com
Hey, chani -
Another thing that came to mind as I was re-reading your post and the comments with it, is that I bet that many Americans are praising that book for political reasons. There's a big rift in the the american society between religious and non-religious or more likely, christian and non-christian. I think that the non-christian segment is seeing the book as "proof" or support for their point of view. Where as the christian segment has villainized Dan Brown for trying to destroy christianity. It has political undertones for americans, as if anything doesn't these days.

Me? I liked the book, but have no political or historical uses for it because it's just a book in the fiction aisle of the store. Oh, and I hate politics. Absolutely abhor them. Being the agnostic that I am, I'm all about the gray area. And politicians hate gray area. "You must choose a side" and all that bullying.

Well that's more politically charged than I ever get, so I'm stopping now before I become physically ill. But I thought that perhaps knowing the political/religious ties that many americans are putting with the book might be intersting to you. If Dan Brown is proved to be a rip-off, then both political sides lose ammunition that is being used to further promote their side's agenda. And they sure don't want that to happen. It's about winning, even if it means basing their debate on false/unproven ground.

Date: 2005-06-16 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frenchani.livejournal.com
Yeah you're probably right. James loved that book for a reason I guess...

But give a try to Dan Simmons' "Clarion Comfort", there's an old Southern Lady in that novel who is the best Villain ever I've read about. I thought that living in the South you might enjoy it.

Date: 2005-06-16 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] so-sharlemaine.livejournal.com
sounds interesting. I'll check it out on Amazon. I always love a villain southern lady.

BTW... still waiting on that Dan McRae I ordered from them. They did say it would be about six weeks getting here.

Date: 2005-06-16 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frenchani.livejournal.com
Tom McRae! Glad you ordered it. I hope you'll like his music.

Next I'm converting you to the Giles/Ethan lurvvvvvvve! LOL

Profile

chani: (Default)
chani

July 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415161718 1920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 17th, 2026 09:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios