Date: 2006-05-08 09:37 am (UTC)
But did Henry really want to kill her?

Faux-Henry had her by the neck and it was only Locke hitting him with his cane that kept him from killing Ana. Yes, he wanted her dead.

I think that Michael lied. I don't think he wants them to attack the Others at all. He didn't kill Ana because she was no longer useful. I think he killed her in order to free her.

Well, I think Michael either is hiding something.

Now how the hell would Michael think he was freeing Ana? Especially, since he told her he was sorry. That logically doesn't match up. Suddenly you want to imbue Michael with some wisdom others do not have on the island? How should he know anything other than what is happening temporally, in the flesh, and thus he killed Ana for his own reasons. And that reason is to create an expediency towards an attack.

Michael knew about Ana's leadership skills, he saw it on the trek across the island. Possibly, he was getting rid of her for that reason. He could create that expediency by releasing faux-Henry. Anyone who was around when he did that was necessarily detrimental to that plan. Thus Ana had to go, as well as Libby. And of course, Michael also had to be injured. But why? For Walt or for reasons concerning the needs of the Others?

...

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

chani: (Default)
chani

July 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415161718 1920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 08:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios